{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-001","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Kill the vocabulary if it repeatedly reifies the whole or erases finite bearers.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:MET:ONE_MANY"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Dasein and situated dasein stay distinct","proposition":"Capitalized Dasein names the selected coherent whole while situated dasein names a finite actual bearer within it; neither is an inventory of the other.","residual_debt":"Whether Dasein is the best ontology remains open.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Ordinary whole-part and standpoint language does the same work with fewer commitments.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-002","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Retire Finity wherever it adds ambiguity rather than a valid type distinction.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["FORMAL:FIELD-01"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Finity is determinate manifestation","proposition":"Finity names determinate manifestation in a declared frame, not finite cardinality and not numeric one.","residual_debt":"No new arithmetic follows from the name.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/00_THE_AMRITA.md","sha256":"dce26b620dfa9b30eee9880c85c6204f1aa3dc3ce6b281ae50ce55109067e97f"}],"strongest_rival":"Standard terms such as defined value, limit, event, or instantiation are clearer.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-003","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Kill any claimed novelty or extra result not earned beyond the native type discipline.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:LOG:REFERENCE"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Value, word, process, operator, and boundary are different types","proposition":"A value, its written sign, a generating process, an operator, and a boundary object may be related without being identical.","residual_debt":"The native distinctions survive without Emergentist names.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/00_THE_AMRITA.md","sha256":"dce26b620dfa9b30eee9880c85c6204f1aa3dc3ce6b281ae50ce55109067e97f"}],"strongest_rival":"Native mathematical type systems already prevent these collisions.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-004","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I/C]","kill_criterion":"Demote to mnemonic wherever matched native models equal or beat it on held-out value and cost.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:SCI:EMERGENCE"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Higher descriptions may add explanatory value without blocking reduction","proposition":"A macro description can remain explanatorily useful when a lower-level reduction exists, provided it earns prediction, intervention, compression, or portability after costs.","residual_debt":"Reduction and native domain models remain.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Matched lower-level models may equal or beat every macro benefit.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-005","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Kill distinctiveness if the typing adds no correct prediction or clarification beyond native accounts.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:SCI:MEASUREMENT"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Quantum state and actual record are different types","proposition":"A probability-bearing quantum state and a definite measurement record should not be conflated, even though the distinction alone does not solve measurement.","residual_debt":"The measurement problem and Born-rule interpretation remain open.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Standard quantum foundations already separates states, channels, apparatus and records.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-006","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Kill the framework-specific claim if independent provenance adds no discipline beyond native audit practice.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:SCI:CAUSATION"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Commitment and received consequence need separate receipts","proposition":"An actor's stated plan or self-report is not the independently received consequence of the act.","residual_debt":"Independent outcome evidence remains necessary.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Ordinary audit and causal-inference practice already enforces this separation.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-007","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Kill the framework-specific gloss if it adds no discriminator beyond present-carrier models.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:MIN:INTENTIONALITY"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Possibility acts only through actual carriers","proposition":"Represented D5 possibilities influence action only through actual D4 models, bodies, utterances, instruments, memories or institutions.","residual_debt":"Possible content remains distinct from physical causation.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Standard representational and control theories explain the same causal chain.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-008","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Retire Soul Loop vocabulary if it adds no error detection, correction or transfer benefit.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:EPI:EXTERNAL_WORLD"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"The Soul Loop preserves execution and outcome gaps","proposition":"A useful reflective loop keeps perception, modelling, commitment, authorization, execution, observation and revision distinguishable.","residual_debt":"The underlying feedback and audit distinctions survive.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Decision journals and feedback control provide a simpler equivalent.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-009","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[C]","kill_criterion":"Kill the construct if those native variables exhaust prediction and intervention response.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:POL:COLLECTIVE_ACTION"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Egregoreotype is an observable coordination hypothesis","proposition":"An egregoreotype may be tested as persistent distributed coordination with shared trace, incentive coupling, boundary maintenance and intervention-sensitive added value, without asserting personhood.","residual_debt":"The observable carriers and coordination mechanisms remain.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Carrier identity, incentives, direct communication and environment may exhaust the effect.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-010","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[C]","kill_criterion":"Kill the incremental claim if language variables add no held-out predictive or intervention value.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:LOG:RULE_FOLLOWING"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Language may deepen coordination","proposition":"Shared language may add coordination depth beyond thin exchange signals, but it transfers no truth, consent or common worldview by itself.","residual_debt":"Trade and communication remain bounded coordination channels.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Repeated interaction, incentives and institutions may explain all coordination gains.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-011","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[C]","kill_criterion":"Kill the worldview variable if it adds no held-out value after native conflict controls.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:POL:POWER"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Worldview competition can be one cause of conflict","proposition":"Conflicting coordination patterns may contribute to war alongside security, capacity, geography, finance, trauma and revenge.","residual_debt":"The multicausal conflict account and nonviolence fence survive.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Material and strategic variables may exhaust the explanatory gain.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-012","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Kill any crosswalk that predicts nothing and invites hierarchy or identity transfer.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:EPI:TESTIMONY"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Rosetta axes must not collapse","proposition":"Trophic role, replicator layer, reasoning function, operator alias and mating or kinship structure are separate axes unless a specific bridge is earned.","residual_debt":"The native taxonomies remain authoritative.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_META/00_ONE_SITTING_CLAIM_CARD_SET_01.md","sha256":"5561c22d78be84040e15e25b420bfe201edf49cb251ba5c2fad9b331a3fca536"}],"strongest_rival":"No crosswalk is needed; native taxonomies should remain separate.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-013","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Drop the aliases if they cause persistent rank, essence or authority leakage.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:POL:LEGITIMACY"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Functions are trainable and mobile","proposition":"Rosetta work functions are movable practices and never hereditary classes, ranks of human worth or sovereign identities.","residual_debt":"Equal worth and trainable functional roles remain.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_META/00_ONE_SITTING_CLAIM_CARD_SET_01.md","sha256":"5561c22d78be84040e15e25b420bfe201edf49cb251ba5c2fad9b331a3fca536"}],"strongest_rival":"Plain role descriptions avoid caste and mythic hazards entirely.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-014","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I/C]","kill_criterion":"Kill distinctiveness if the decomposition changes no attribution, intervention or correction decision.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:MIN:FREE_WILL","PQA54@0.1:MIN:CONSCIOUSNESS"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Operational agency is usable under metaphysical nonclosure","proposition":"Agents can be assessed by represented options, means, authorization, action and correction while consciousness, ultimate freedom and post-death survival remain open.","residual_debt":"The hard problem and ultimate freedom remain open.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Compatibilist and control-based agency already provide the usable account.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-015","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I/C]","kill_criterion":"Kill the transfer if it hides delayed cost, harmed bearers, uncertainty or decorative Exit.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:ETH:POPULATION"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Teleology needs two clocks and all bearers","proposition":"A teleological proposal must expose short-horizon enactment and long-horizon option effects for every affected bearer rather than hiding delayed cost in one score.","residual_debt":"Bearer and horizon visibility remain useful.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Standard multi-criteria and intergenerational decision theory may dominate the framework.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-016","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S/I/C]","kill_criterion":"Kill or narrow the bridge if the conclusion is smuggled into reciprocity or adds no value over serious rivals.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:ETH:IS_OUGHT"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Reciprocal public reason has a conditional bridge","proposition":"Inside a voluntarily undertaken reciprocal public-reason practice, arbitrary denial of visibility, contest, correction or feasible Exit defeats the declared reciprocity.","residual_debt":"The practice premise and general is-ought problem remain explicit.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Contractualism, discourse ethics or constructivism may explain the same duties more faithfully.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-017","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I/C]","kill_criterion":"Kill or narrow the extension if it self-authorizes, hides conflicts or launders proxy harm.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:POL:REPRESENTATION"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Guardianship is separate from reciprocity","proposition":"Care for dependent, absent, nonhuman, ecological and future bearers is a separately chosen, bounded and reviewable extension, not proof borrowed from co-agency.","residual_debt":"Dependent bearers still require visible protection against capture.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Rights, capabilities, fiduciary, precautionary and supported-decision safeguards may perform better.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-018","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S/I/C]","kill_criterion":"Kill framework distinctiveness if it adds no clarity or hard-case discrimination.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:ETH:MORAL_REALISM"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Moral objectivity must be typed","proposition":"Definition stability, procedural reproducibility, empirical adequacy and stance-independent moral realism are different claims and must not inherit one another's warrant.","residual_debt":"Moral realism remains open.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"Established metaethical distinctions already perform the same separation.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-019","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[D/C]","kill_criterion":"Kill the construct if it rewards reframing, hides residuals or adds no value over native and generic controls.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["SYNTH:PQA-EARNED-RESULT"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"Selected is not solved","proposition":"A philosophical question earns a result only after native recovery, premise preservation, serious controls, unfired kills and independent native-domain review.","residual_debt":"The public denominator and correction ledger survive.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/prompts/questions.json","sha256":"1ea31b71c52c274960af9361994d77f0b849eee2579610822c25293a99280250"}],"strongest_rival":"Native peer review without a framework benchmark may be more faithful and efficient.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-020","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[D]","kill_criterion":"Reject the maxim as universal law if bearer-indexed hard cases show that its constitutive reading obscures justified exceptions.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["SYNTH:MEANS-MESSAGE"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"The means is the message","proposition":"How an act is carried already shapes the relation it claims to serve; carriers, costs, consent, authority, reversibility and externalities are part of the claim.","residual_debt":"Means must still be disclosed and contested.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"POST_FREEZE_OWNER_DIRECTION","path":"00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","sha256":"8fe987447d48a0dd9c559f7769bf05c7f42fd63f9edc0e26440608c744baf107"}],"strongest_rival":"Consequentialist cases may permit harmful means when expected outcomes dominate.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-021","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[D]","kill_criterion":"Reject the non-aggregation reading where a transparent authorized scalar robustly handles hard cases better.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["SYNTH:ENDS-LIMITS"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"The ends are the limits","proposition":"Every desired end remains bounded for each affected bearer and responsible horizon; no aggregate end erases a failed row.","residual_debt":"Hard limits, uncertainty and Exit remain visible.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"POST_FREEZE_OWNER_DIRECTION","path":"00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","sha256":"8fe987447d48a0dd9c559f7769bf05c7f42fd63f9edc0e26440608c744baf107"}],"strongest_rival":"A defended aggregation rule may justify trade-offs across bearers and horizons.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"SURVIVOR_CANDIDATE","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-AMR-022","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Kill its use if it obscures native game structure or repeatedly collapses necessary distinctions.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":["PQA54@0.1:SCI:EMERGENCE"],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"AMRITA","plain_name":"G7 closure is vocabulary-scoped","proposition":"Four bearer-oriented transfers plus three read-only frames close the selected G7 vocabulary and nothing larger.","residual_debt":"The four typed transfer cells and three separate frame labels remain removable.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The vocabulary is an arbitrary mnemonic with no explanatory benefit.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, source record and explicit residual remain."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-001","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Titan glyphs are not arithmetic operands","proposition":"Treating •, ⊙ or ○ as ordinary numeric operands or sovereign arithmetic identities is a type error unless a separate numeric model is explicitly declared.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/04_WHAT_DIED.md","sha256":"2753cfc380135cc842bff68ca865ee70a38cdd772486dc7b1e9484802c458d84"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-002","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Dasein is not a self-containing set or jointly actual world bundle","proposition":"Do not turn the selected Dasein whole into a naive self-membered set, make rival possible worlds jointly actual, or identify one ego with the whole.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-003","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Convergence is not proof","proposition":"Cross-tradition resemblance, model agreement and repeated rendering are robustness clues, never independent truth evidence by themselves.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/00_THE_AMRITA.md","sha256":"dce26b620dfa9b30eee9880c85c6204f1aa3dc3ce6b281ae50ce55109067e97f"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-004","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Finity is not finite cardinality or numeric one","proposition":"Do not reduce Finity to finite cardinality or identify the centre glyph with ordinary numeric one.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/00_THE_AMRITA.md","sha256":"dce26b620dfa9b30eee9880c85c6204f1aa3dc3ce6b281ae50ce55109067e97f"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-005","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Generative arithmetic does not replace field mathematics","proposition":"No Titan or projective notation makes field division by zero defined or replaces native mathematics without an explicit structure change.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","sha256":"07c2d9a114624ec4720a66602e8ddf7a47142f1996cec588c025778656d410f6"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-006","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"A process is not its completed denotation","proposition":"A non-halting or asymptotic process may denote a completed object in a declared semantics but is not identical to that denoted value.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","sha256":"07c2d9a114624ec4720a66602e8ddf7a47142f1996cec588c025778656d410f6"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-007","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Missing reduction is not proof of strong emergence","proposition":"Failure to provide a reduction is explanatory debt, not evidence that ontological strong emergence has been proved.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-008","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Macro novelty needs matched controls","proposition":"A higher-level description earns no novelty claim without fair lower-level, native and complexity-matched controls.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-009","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Quantum state, record and time must not collapse","proposition":"Do not equate quantum state with event, infer temporal order from unordered snapshots, or claim that D3 typing solves measurement.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","sha256":"07c2d9a114624ec4720a66602e8ddf7a47142f1996cec588c025778656d410f6"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-010","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Self-issued success is not world-contact evidence","proposition":"An actor's own success report can record commitment but cannot alone establish received consequence or independent calibration.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-011","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Possibility itself does not physically act","proposition":"D5 possible content does not push matter, widen a light cone or cause events without an actual D4 carrier or separately evidenced law.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/02_EMERGENTISM_CORE/F5Fork.v1.json","sha256":"09b2c5700a20fd2d90ad0c2dc11999ad048faea0baf6ce08ac327809a9c1ddb6"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-012","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Present future models do not prove retrocausality","proposition":"Ordinary model-mediated anticipation is not evidence for a future-boundary interaction or F5-R.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/02_EMERGENTISM_CORE/F5Fork.v1.json","sha256":"09b2c5700a20fd2d90ad0c2dc11999ad048faea0baf6ce08ac327809a9c1ddb6"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-013","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Aliases are not castes, essences or verdicts","proposition":"Mythic names and Titan frames must not become hereditary human classes, person-worth ranks or pre-outcome moral judgments.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_META/00_ONE_SITTING_CLAIM_CARD_SET_01.md","sha256":"5561c22d78be84040e15e25b420bfe201edf49cb251ba5c2fad9b331a3fca536"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-014","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Four plus three does not prove seven is necessary","proposition":"G7 closes only the selected vocabulary and does not prove exactly seven fundamental kinds or exhaust all games.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-015","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"The Burrisphere itinerary is not time or moral ascent","proposition":"The selected 360-degree reading path is not recurrence, chronology, physical helix, causal mechanism or moral rank.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-016","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"M4 is not a global or vector-space basis","proposition":"M4 may be tested as a lossy code only inside a frozen comparator class; it is not a reconstruction theorem or globally unique basis.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-017","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"The centre is not universally optimal or costless","proposition":"The reciprocal centre is analytically balanced but not a universal empirical optimum, trade-off eraser or Dharma theorem.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-018","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Egregoreotype does not confer personhood","proposition":"Persistent coordination does not by itself establish consciousness, legal personhood, autonomous authority or moral patienthood.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-019","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Synchrony and trade do not establish truth or consent","proposition":"Coordination signals can support inference but do not establish truth, fairness, consent or a shared worldview by themselves.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-020","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[I]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"War is not reducible to worldview competition","proposition":"Worldview conflict is at most one variable among material and strategic causes and never licenses violence.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-021","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Rosetta axes do not form hereditary hierarchy","proposition":"Trophic, replicator, reasoning, operator, Varna and mating axes may not be collapsed into a hereditary rank order.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_META/00_ONE_SITTING_CLAIM_CARD_SET_01.md","sha256":"5561c22d78be84040e15e25b420bfe201edf49cb251ba5c2fad9b331a3fca536"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-022","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Aggregates do not hide harmed bearers","proposition":"Sacrifice language, product scores and total option gains cannot cancel an undisclosed harmed bearer.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-023","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Consciousness, free will, death and afterlife remain open","proposition":"Operational decompositions do not solve the hard problem, ultimate freedom, death or personal survival.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md","sha256":"7fd27952d85a39ed46d909f500a96f9f368b98236cb464f6f8970b61f99f9707"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-024","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Geometry does not prove morality or cosmic purpose","proposition":"The reciprocal chart, RCAB and GEX do not prove stance-independent morality, cosmic teleology or coercive guardianship.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-025","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Force maps and strong emergence remain conjectures","proposition":"Correspondence, dimensional order and intuitive fit do not establish a force assignment or strong-emergence crossing.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-026","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"D6 is not D0, afterlife, rank or sixth freedom","proposition":"D6 is a nonclosure and Exit marker; boundary-role resemblance neither identifies it with D0 nor makes it an attainment or afterlife.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","claim_ids":["OS01"],"frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-027","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Selection, clarification and reframing are not resolution","proposition":"A selected question or elegant reframe cannot be counted as dissolved or resolved, and a bounded majority cannot become most philosophy.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/prompts/questions.json","sha256":"1ea31b71c52c274960af9361994d77f0b849eee2579610822c25293a99280250"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-028","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[S]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["readers","researchers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"Process receipts are not external validation","proposition":"Offline-ready, ratification, adherents, commits and AI agreement are bounded process facts rather than scientific or philosophical validation.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/05_THE_METHOD.md","sha256":"14c3b11399c931226129b4c186beb4c80da4f38e8b5bdddcbdf61cff576d78da"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"assumptions":["source and evidence tier remain attached","publication does not create earned review"],"cheapest_next_test":"One blinded native-domain review against a generic decomposition control.","classification":"POISON_WARNING","discriminator":"Compare the exact proposition with its native account and simplest serious rival on clarification, prediction, intervention, compression or harm detection.","drop_id":"TC-HAL-029","earned_review":{"independent_review_count":0,"receipts":[],"state":"UNREVIEWED"},"ends_limits":{"exit":"drop the claim or framework when it adds no value","hard_limit":"no tier promotion, false closure, hidden bearer or authority transfer","option_change":"preserve challenge, correction and Exit","residue":"unpaid explanatory and empirical debt stays visible","target":"a clearer, contestable proposition and test","uncertainty":"independent review and world contact remain absent"},"evidence_tier":"[D]","kill_criterion":"Narrow or retire the warning if an explicit typed model survives native review and its declared discriminator.","lifecycle":"SOURCE_BOUND","linked_problem_ids":[],"means_message":{"authority":"source owners retain semantics; the projection cannot authorize action","bearers":["actors","affected bearers","future readers"],"carrier":"source-bound text and machine record","consent_or_mandate":"no worldview adoption required; consequence-bearing use needs a declared mandate","cost":"attention, implementation cost and risk of misclassification","externalities":"overclaim, hidden bearer harm and model-training misquotation remain possible","long_horizon":"revision after downstream consequence","reversibility":"classification is revisable and predecessor bytes are preserved","short_horizon":"publication and first application"},"mythic_alias":"HALAHALA","plain_name":"The maxim is not a theorem or permission","proposition":"The means-message and ends-limits maxim is a disclosed normative selection, never a theorem and never permission for ends to justify means.","residual_debt":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available.","revision_history":[{"date":"2026-08-23","event":"source-bound candidate created in the Third Churning rebuild"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ChurningDrop.v1","scope":"Third Churning frozen-source proposition","source_refs":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","frozen_commit":"POST_FREEZE_OWNER_DIRECTION","path":"00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","sha256":"8fe987447d48a0dd9c559f7769bf05c7f42fd63f9edc0e26440608c744baf107"}],"strongest_rival":"The warning may be overbroad; a narrowly typed model could lawfully recover part of the rejected claim.","survivor_if_killed":"The narrow lawful use and native domain remain available."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:GROUND","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MET","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"ground","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-001","TC-HAL-002"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace §7; Heidegger, Introduction to Metaphysics.","native_problem":"Ground, sufficient reason and explanatory termination.","native_reference":"Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace §7; Heidegger, Introduction to Metaphysics.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:GROUND","proposed_answer":"Emergentism places a GROUND_BOUNDARY where object-language explanation no longer has a lawful target; it does not turn Ground into an object or necessary being.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Why that boundary rather than a brute fact or necessary truth remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native ground, sufficient reason and explanatory termination. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-05"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:ONE_MANY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MET","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"one_and_many","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-001","TC-HAL-002"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Plato, Parmenides; Aristotle, Metaphysics.","native_problem":"Unity, plurality and dependence without erasure.","native_reference":"Plato, Parmenides; Aristotle, Metaphysics.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:ONE_MANY","proposed_answer":"Typed levels allow one coherent whole and genuine plural situated bearers without identifying either with the other.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"The metaphysical dependence relation is not thereby proved.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native unity, plurality and dependence without erasure. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:UNIVERSALS","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MET","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"universals_particulars","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-001","TC-HAL-002"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Plato, Republic; Aristotle, Categories and Metaphysics.","native_problem":"Realism, nominalism and trope theories of universals.","native_reference":"Plato, Republic; Aristotle, Categories and Metaphysics.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:UNIVERSALS","proposed_answer":"Repeatable properties may be tracked as invariants across transformations while their nominalist, realist or trope ontology remains open.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"What makes an invariant ontologically real remains disputed.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native realism, nominalism and trope theories of universals. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-06"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:IDENTITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MET","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"identity_persistence","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-001","TC-HAL-002"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding II.27; Parfit, Reasons and Persons.","native_problem":"Numerical identity, continuity, constitution and persistence.","native_reference":"Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding II.27; Parfit, Reasons and Persons.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:IDENTITY","proposed_answer":"Identity claims must declare which continuity—material, causal, structural, functional, narrative or authorized—carries the same bearer.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"No universal criterion of persistence follows.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native numerical identity, continuity, constitution and persistence. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:MODALITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MET","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"modality_possible_worlds","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-001","TC-HAL-002"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Kripke, Naming and Necessity; Lewis, On the Plurality of Worlds.","native_problem":"Modal truth, accessibility and possible-world semantics.","native_reference":"Kripke, Naming and Necessity; Lewis, On the Plurality of Worlds.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:MODALITY","proposed_answer":"Possible content, actual carriers and actual histories are distinct types; this blocks actuality inflation without choosing modal realism.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Truthmakers for modal claims remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native modal truth, accessibility and possible-world semantics. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:TIME","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MET","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"time_change","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-001","TC-HAL-002"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Aristotle, Physics IV; McTaggart, The Unreality of Time.","native_problem":"A-series, B-series, passage and change.","native_reference":"Aristotle, Physics IV; McTaggart, The Unreality of Time.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MET:TIME","proposed_answer":"Ordered records and lawful dynamics are required before a sequence can count as time; the dimensional or Burrisphere order alone is not temporal.","proposed_effect":"OPEN","remaining_debt":"Passage, tense and fundamentality remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native a-series, b-series, passage and change. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:EXTERNAL_WORLD","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"EPI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"external_world","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-006","TC-HAL-003"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Descartes, Meditations I; Moore, Proof of an External World.","native_problem":"External-world skepticism and perceptual warrant.","native_reference":"Descartes, Meditations I; Moore, Proof of an External World.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:EXTERNAL_WORLD","proposed_answer":"Resistance, independent consequence and correction provide public warrant beyond present self-report without defeating global skepticism deductively.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"The ultimate skeptical challenge remains.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native external-world skepticism and perceptual warrant. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:INDUCTION","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"EPI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"induction","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-006","TC-HAL-003"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding IV; Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.","native_problem":"Hume's problem of induction and projectibility.","native_reference":"Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding IV; Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:INDUCTION","proposed_answer":"Induction is fallible projectibility whose warrant is comparative calibration, intervention and correction rather than logical entailment.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"The circularity and choice of projectible predicates remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native hume's problem of induction and projectibility. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:GETTIER","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"EPI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"knowledge_gettier","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-006","TC-HAL-003"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Plato, Theaetetus; Gettier, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?","native_problem":"Gettier luck and analyses of knowledge.","native_reference":"Plato, Theaetetus; Gettier, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:GETTIER","proposed_answer":"True belief needs a provenance-sensitive warrant that remains connected to the fact through relevant counterfactuals and correction paths.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Whether this is knowledge or another condition remains contested.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native gettier luck and analyses of knowledge. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:APRIORI","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"EPI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"a_priori","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-006","TC-HAL-003"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Kant, Critique of Pure Reason; BonJour, In Defense of Pure Reason.","native_problem":"A priori warrant, rational insight and empiricism.","native_reference":"Kant, Critique of Pure Reason; BonJour, In Defense of Pure Reason.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:APRIORI","proposed_answer":"A priori warrant can be internal necessity inside a declared formal system without becoming a claim about the world's ontology.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"How formal insight is known remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native a priori warrant, rational insight and empiricism. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:TESTIMONY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"EPI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"testimony","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-006","TC-HAL-003"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Coady, Testimony; Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding X.","native_problem":"Testimonial warrant, reductionism and social dependence.","native_reference":"Coady, Testimony; Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding X.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:TESTIMONY","proposed_answer":"Testimony carries warrant only through declared provenance, competence, calibration, contest and independent contact appropriate to the claim.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Reductionism versus anti-reductionism remains.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native testimonial warrant, reductionism and social dependence. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:DISAGREEMENT","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"EPI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"disagreement_underdetermination","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-006","TC-HAL-003"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Feldman and Warfield, Disagreement; Christensen, Epistemology of Disagreement.","native_problem":"Peer disagreement, conciliation and steadfastness.","native_reference":"Feldman and Warfield, Disagreement; Christensen, Epistemology of Disagreement.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:DISAGREEMENT","proposed_answer":"Rational disagreement should preserve rivals, discriminators and underdetermination; consensus is never a truth bonus.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"How much peers should conciliate remains case-specific.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native peer disagreement, conciliation and steadfastness. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-08"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:LIAR","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"LOG","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"liar_self_reference","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-003","TC-HAL-006"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Tarski, The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages; Kripke, Outline of a Theory of Truth.","native_problem":"Semantic self-reference, truth predicates and hierarchy.","native_reference":"Tarski, The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages; Kripke, Outline of a Theory of Truth.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:LIAR","proposed_answer":"A liar construction may dissolve within a typed or hierarchical truth language when the offending self-application is excluded explicitly.","proposed_effect":"CONDITIONAL_RESOLUTION","remaining_debt":"Revenge paradoxes and natural-language truth remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native semantic self-reference, truth predicates and hierarchy. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["FORMAL:RUSSELL-01","LEGACY:PD-08"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:RUSSELL","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"LOG","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"russell_set_formation","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-003","TC-HAL-006"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Russell, Principles of Mathematics; Zermelo, Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory I.","native_problem":"Unrestricted comprehension and axiomatic set formation.","native_reference":"Russell, Principles of Mathematics; Zermelo, Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory I.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:RUSSELL","proposed_answer":"The unrestricted formation rule fails; restricted comprehension or a declared type discipline preserves lawful set formation.","proposed_effect":"FORMAL_CORRECTION","remaining_debt":"Choice among foundations remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native unrestricted comprehension and axiomatic set formation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["FORMAL:GODEL-01"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:GODEL","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"LOG","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"incompleteness","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-003","TC-HAL-006"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Gödel, On Formally Undecidable Propositions (1931).","native_problem":"Formal consistency, completeness and arithmetical truth.","native_reference":"Gödel, On Formally Undecidable Propositions (1931).","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:GODEL","proposed_answer":"Incompleteness is retained as a nonclosure result for systems meeting its hypotheses; no outside glyph or observer completes the system.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Philosophical interpretations remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native formal consistency, completeness and arithmetical truth. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:SORITES","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"LOG","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"vagueness_sorites","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-003","TC-HAL-006"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Eubulides' sorites tradition; Williamson, Vagueness.","native_problem":"Vagueness, tolerance principles and borderline cases.","native_reference":"Eubulides' sorites tradition; Williamson, Vagueness.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:SORITES","proposed_answer":"Sorites arguments require an explicit scale, threshold rule and uncertainty region; this diagnoses hidden boundary assumptions without eliminating vagueness.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"A theory of vague truth remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native vagueness, tolerance principles and borderline cases. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:REFERENCE","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"LOG","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"reference_meaning","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-003","TC-HAL-006"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Frege, On Sense and Reference; Kripke, Naming and Necessity.","native_problem":"Sense, reference, causal naming and context.","native_reference":"Frege, On Sense and Reference; Kripke, Naming and Necessity.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:REFERENCE","proposed_answer":"Actual signs and uses can carry represented content through causal, inferential and social practices while sign, referent and interpretation stay distinct.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"A complete metasemantics remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native sense, reference, causal naming and context. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:RULE_FOLLOWING","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"LOG","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"rule_following_truth","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-003","TC-HAL-006"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations; Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.","native_problem":"Normativity of meaning and rule-following skepticism.","native_reference":"Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations; Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:RULE_FOLLOWING","proposed_answer":"Public correction, shared practice and counterfactual response constrain rule following without converting agreement into truth.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"The normativity of meaning remains.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native normativity of meaning and rule-following skepticism. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-14"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:MIND_BODY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MIN","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"mind_body","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-014","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Descartes, Meditations VI; Ryle, The Concept of Mind.","native_problem":"Dualism, physicalism, functionalism and realization.","native_reference":"Descartes, Meditations VI; Ryle, The Concept of Mind.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:MIND_BODY","proposed_answer":"D5 content is realized through D4 carriers, separating content from carrier without establishing physicalism, dualism or a psychophysical mechanism.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"The realization and consciousness relations remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native dualism, physicalism, functionalism and realization. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-13","LEGACY:PD-19"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:CONSCIOUSNESS","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MIN","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"hard_problem","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-014","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Chalmers, Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness; Nagel, What Is It Like to Be a Bat?","native_problem":"Phenomenal consciousness and the explanatory gap.","native_reference":"Chalmers, Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness; Nagel, What Is It Like to Be a Bat?","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:CONSCIOUSNESS","proposed_answer":"Emergentism can type reports, carriers, access and behavior but presently supplies no mechanism that explains why processing is accompanied by experience.","proposed_effect":"OPEN","remaining_debt":"The hard problem remains fully open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native phenomenal consciousness and the explanatory gap. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:INTENTIONALITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MIN","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"intentionality","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-014","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint; Searle, Intentionality.","native_problem":"Aboutness, content and representation.","native_reference":"Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint; Searle, Intentionality.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:INTENTIONALITY","proposed_answer":"Present actual representations can be about absent or possible content; the content itself need not physically act.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Naturalization of original intentionality remains.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native aboutness, content and representation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:PERSONAL_IDENTITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MIN","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"personal_identity","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-014","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Locke, Essay II.27; Parfit, Reasons and Persons.","native_problem":"Personal identity, continuity, fission and survival.","native_reference":"Locke, Essay II.27; Parfit, Reasons and Persons.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:PERSONAL_IDENTITY","proposed_answer":"Personal persistence requires a declared bundle of bodily, causal, psychological, narrative and authorized continuities, with fission debt preserved.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"No single necessary and sufficient criterion is established.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native personal identity, continuity, fission and survival. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-11"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:FREE_WILL","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MIN","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"free_will_determinism","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-014","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hume, Enquiry VIII; Frankfurt, Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.","native_problem":"Compatibilism, sourcehood, alternatives and determinism.","native_reference":"Hume, Enquiry VIII; Frankfurt, Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:FREE_WILL","proposed_answer":"Operational agency can be assessed through represented options, available means, authorization, action and correction without settling ultimate sourcehood.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Ultimate freedom and desert remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native compatibilism, sourcehood, alternatives and determinism. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:OTHER_MINDS","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"MIN","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"other_minds_ai","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-014","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence; Nagel, What Is It Like to Be a Bat?","native_problem":"Other minds, behavioral evidence and machine mentality.","native_reference":"Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence; Nagel, What Is It Like to Be a Bat?","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:MIN:OTHER_MINDS","proposed_answer":"Other minds and AI mentality require convergent public evidence across behavior, structure, intervention and self-report; private phenomenology remains inaccessible.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"No consciousness attribution is earned here.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native other minds, behavioral evidence and machine mentality. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:CAUSATION","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"SCI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"causation","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-009"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hume, Enquiry VII; Pearl, Causality.","native_problem":"Counterfactual, interventionist, regularity and process accounts.","native_reference":"Hume, Enquiry VII; Pearl, Causality.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:CAUSATION","proposed_answer":"Causal claims should expose intervention, counterfactual, temporal and receipt structure rather than rest on correlation or narrative fit.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Competing metaphysics of causation remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native counterfactual, interventionist, regularity and process accounts. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:LAWS","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"SCI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"laws_explanation","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-009"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hempel and Oppenheim, Studies in the Logic of Explanation; van Fraassen, The Scientific Image.","native_problem":"Laws, models, explanation and necessity.","native_reference":"Hempel and Oppenheim, Studies in the Logic of Explanation; van Fraassen, The Scientific Image.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:LAWS","proposed_answer":"Law, model, mechanism, constraint and explanation are different types whose adequacy must be tested in their native domain.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"What makes laws necessary remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native laws, models, explanation and necessity. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:EMERGENCE","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"SCI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"reduction_emergence","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-009"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Nagel, The Structure of Science; Anderson, More Is Different.","native_problem":"Reduction, multiple realization, emergence and universality.","native_reference":"Nagel, The Structure of Science; Anderson, More Is Different.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:EMERGENCE","proposed_answer":"Emergence claims must distinguish construction, reduction, multiple realization, constraint and explanatory usefulness; missing reduction is not proof of strength.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Every crossing remains an empirical wager.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native reduction, multiple realization, emergence and universality. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["FORMAL:MEAS-01","LEGACY:PD-12"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:MEASUREMENT","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"SCI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"quantum_measurement","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-009"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics; Bell, Against Measurement.","native_problem":"Measurement, decoherence, outcomes and interpretation.","native_reference":"von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics; Bell, Against Measurement.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:MEASUREMENT","proposed_answer":"Quantum state, interaction, probability and actual record remain separate; the typing blocks conflation but selects no interpretation.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Definite outcomes and Born weights remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native measurement, decoherence, outcomes and interpretation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-25"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:BELL","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"SCI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"bell_locality_realism","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-009"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox (1964).","native_problem":"Bell inequalities, locality and hidden-variable assumptions.","native_reference":"Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox (1964).","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:BELL","proposed_answer":"Bell-type conclusions retain their exact assumptions; no Emergentist frame restores a conjunction experimentally ruled out.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Interpretation and viable assumption packages remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native bell inequalities, locality and hidden-variable assumptions. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:PROBABILITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"SCI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"probability_indeterminacy","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-009"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Kolmogorov, Foundations of the Theory of Probability; de Finetti, Theory of Probability.","native_problem":"Interpretations of probability and objective chance.","native_reference":"Kolmogorov, Foundations of the Theory of Probability; de Finetti, Theory of Probability.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:PROBABILITY","proposed_answer":"Probability calculus, model-relative uncertainty, credence and physical chance are separate claims whose interpretation must be declared.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"The ontology of chance remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native interpretations of probability and objective chance. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-10"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:IS_OUGHT","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ETH","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"is_ought","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-018","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hume, Treatise of Human Nature III.i.1.","native_problem":"Hume's is–ought distinction and bridge principles.","native_reference":"Hume, Treatise of Human Nature III.i.1.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:IS_OUGHT","proposed_answer":"RCAB supplies a constitutive ought only inside a disclosed reciprocal public-reason practice; it is not a value-free derivation.","proposed_effect":"CONDITIONAL_RESOLUTION","remaining_debt":"The general is-ought problem and moral realism remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native hume's is–ought distinction and bridge principles. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:MORAL_REALISM","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ETH","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"moral_realism_error","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-018","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Moore, Principia Ethica; Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.","native_problem":"Moral realism, constructivism, pluralism and error theory.","native_reference":"Moore, Principia Ethica; Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:MORAL_REALISM","proposed_answer":"Definition stability, reproducibility, world adequacy and stance-independent moral truth are distinct; only the first is presently internal to the model.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Moral realism remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native moral realism, constructivism, pluralism and error theory. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:EUTHYPHRO","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ETH","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"euthyphro_authority","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-018","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Plato, Euthyphro.","native_problem":"Normative authority and the Euthyphro dilemma.","native_reference":"Plato, Euthyphro.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:EUTHYPHRO","proposed_answer":"Authority cannot manufacture the Good merely by command; Emergentism separately chooses Justice and exposes its price.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Why Justice is ultimately binding remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native normative authority and the euthyphro dilemma. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:RIGHTS_OUTCOMES","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ETH","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"rights_consequences","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-018","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Kant, Groundwork; Bentham, Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.","native_problem":"Deontology, consequentialism, thresholds and trolley cases.","native_reference":"Kant, Groundwork; Bentham, Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:RIGHTS_OUTCOMES","proposed_answer":"Justice refusals constrain a bearer-complete Pareto ledger before aggregate outcomes are considered.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Thresholds, conflicts and tragic cases remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native deontology, consequentialism, thresholds and trolley cases. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:POPULATION","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ETH","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"aggregation_population","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-018","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Parfit, Reasons and Persons, Part IV.","native_problem":"Population ethics, aggregation and the repugnant conclusion.","native_reference":"Parfit, Reasons and Persons, Part IV.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:POPULATION","proposed_answer":"Bearer and horizon indexing prevents automatic laundering across populations but supplies no complete population ordering.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Nonidentity, aggregation and repugnant-conclusion debt remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native population ethics, aggregation and the repugnant conclusion. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:RESPONSIBILITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ETH","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"responsibility_partiality","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-018","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Strawson, Freedom and Resentment; Williams, Persons, Character and Morality.","native_problem":"Responsibility, reactive attitudes, demandingness and special obligations.","native_reference":"Strawson, Freedom and Resentment; Williams, Persons, Character and Morality.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:RESPONSIBILITY","proposed_answer":"Responsibility should expose agency, means, authorization, foreseeability, consent, power and correction; sacrifice is never intrinsically good.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Desert, partiality and demandingness remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native responsibility, reactive attitudes, demandingness and special obligations. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:LEGITIMACY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"POL","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"legitimacy_authority","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-017","TC-HAL-021"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hobbes, Leviathan; Locke, Second Treatise of Government.","native_problem":"Consent, authorization, obligation and legitimacy.","native_reference":"Hobbes, Leviathan; Locke, Second Treatise of Government.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:LEGITIMACY","proposed_answer":"Legitimacy requires actual authority, bounded mandate, contest, consequence accounting and feasible Exit; coordination alone cannot authorize.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Political obligation and nonconsensual authority remain contested.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native consent, authorization, obligation and legitimacy. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:LIBERTY_EQUALITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"POL","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"liberty_equality","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-017","TC-HAL-021"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Berlin, Two Concepts of Liberty; Rawls, A Theory of Justice.","native_problem":"Negative and positive liberty, equal standing and institutions.","native_reference":"Berlin, Two Concepts of Liberty; Rawls, A Theory of Justice.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:LIBERTY_EQUALITY","proposed_answer":"Liberty is viable option and non-domination for named bearers, while equality constrains standing; neither collapses into one scalar.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Institutional trade-offs remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native negative and positive liberty, equal standing and institutions. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:DISTRIBUTION","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"POL","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"distributive_justice","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-017","TC-HAL-021"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Rawls, A Theory of Justice; Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia.","native_problem":"Equality, entitlement, desert, need and capability.","native_reference":"Rawls, A Theory of Justice; Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:DISTRIBUTION","proposed_answer":"Contribution, support, need, entitlement, capability and burden should remain separate ledger dimensions before any defended aggregation.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"A complete distributive rule remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native equality, entitlement, desert, need and capability. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:COLLECTIVE_ACTION","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"POL","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"collective_action","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-017","TC-HAL-021"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Olson, The Logic of Collective Action; Ostrom, Governing the Commons.","native_problem":"Collective action, commons and cooperation.","native_reference":"Olson, The Logic of Collective Action; Ostrom, Governing the Commons.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:COLLECTIVE_ACTION","proposed_answer":"Persistent trace, repeated interaction, bounded sanctions, contest and receipts make cooperation auditable without assuming harmony.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Institution design remains context-specific.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native collective action, commons and cooperation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:POWER","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"POL","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"power_oppression_extraction","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-017","TC-HAL-021"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Marx, Capital I; Foucault, Discipline and Punish.","native_problem":"Structural power, exploitation, discipline and domination.","native_reference":"Marx, Capital I; Foucault, Discipline and Punish.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:POWER","proposed_answer":"Power is capacity to change options; extraction is a bearer-indexed transfer that hides or sustains uncompensated loss, and the two must not be equated.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Measurement and structural domination remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native structural power, exploitation, discipline and domination. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:REPRESENTATION","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"POL","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"future_nonhuman_representation","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-017","TC-HAL-021"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Singer, Animal Liberation; Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility; Stone, Should Trees Have Standing?","native_problem":"Guardianship, proxy standing, future people and ecological representation.","native_reference":"Singer, Animal Liberation; Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility; Stone, Should Trees Have Standing?","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:POL:REPRESENTATION","proposed_answer":"GEX makes guardianship a chosen, disclosed, conflict-aware, least-restrictive and reviewable mandate rather than inferred consent.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Who may bind absent bearers remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native guardianship, proxy standing, future people and ecological representation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:PLURALISM","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"AXI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"value_pluralism","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-015","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity; Williams, Moral Luck.","native_problem":"Value pluralism, incommensurability and tragic choice.","native_reference":"Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity; Williams, Moral Luck.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:PLURALISM","proposed_answer":"Real value conflicts should remain a vector or Pareto frontier unless an aggregation contract is separately defended.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Tragic choice and incomparability remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native value pluralism, incommensurability and tragic choice. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:BEAUTY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"AXI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"beauty_objectivity","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-015","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Kant, Critique of Judgment; Hume, Of the Standard of Taste.","native_problem":"Aesthetic judgment, universality and taste.","native_reference":"Kant, Critique of Judgment; Hume, Of the Standard of Taste.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:BEAUTY","proposed_answer":"Beauty may be relationally stable across bearer, form, context and response without being reduced to preference or proved stance-independent.","proposed_effect":"OPEN","remaining_debt":"Aesthetic objectivity remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native aesthetic judgment, universality and taste. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:ART","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"AXI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"art_interpretation","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-015","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Danto, The Artworld; Gadamer, Truth and Method.","native_problem":"Artworld, expression, intention and interpretation.","native_reference":"Danto, The Artworld; Gadamer, Truth and Method.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:ART","proposed_answer":"Art is an actual carrier that opens represented possibilities; creator, work, interpretation, institution and effect remain different bearers.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Definition and interpretation limits remain contested.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native artworld, expression, intention and interpretation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-16"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:MEANING","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"AXI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"meaning_of_life","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-015","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus; Nagel, The Absurd.","native_problem":"Meaning, purpose, value and finitude.","native_reference":"Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus; Nagel, The Absurd.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:MEANING","proposed_answer":"Meaning can be enacted orientation that survives consequence and correction for a finite bearer without requiring cosmic assignment.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Whether meaning is objective remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native meaning, purpose, value and finitude. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:SUFFERING","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"AXI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"suffering_absurdity","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-015","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation; Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus.","native_problem":"Suffering, pessimism, absurdity and practical response.","native_reference":"Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation; Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:SUFFERING","proposed_answer":"Suffering must remain bearer-visible and may never be explained away by a totalizing harmony, score or future end.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Why suffering exists and how to respond remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native suffering, pessimism, absurdity and practical response. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-21"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:DEATH","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"AXI","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"death_mortality","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-AMR-015","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-023"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Epicurus, Letter to Menoeceus; Nagel, Death.","native_problem":"Deprivation, annihilation, fear and mortality.","native_reference":"Epicurus, Letter to Menoeceus; Nagel, Death.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:AXI:DEATH","proposed_answer":"Death ends an actual carrier and its option cone; traces may persist, but persistence of effects does not prove personal survival.","proposed_effect":"OPEN","remaining_debt":"The badness of death and afterlife remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native deprivation, annihilation, fear and mortality. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-09"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:NECESSARY_BEING","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ULT","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"necessary_being","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Aquinas, Summa Theologiae I q.2; Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace.","native_problem":"Cosmological arguments, necessity and regress.","native_reference":"Aquinas, Summa Theologiae I q.2; Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:NECESSARY_BEING","proposed_answer":"A declared Ground boundary stops one explanatory grammar without proving a necessary being or necessary existent.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Cosmological arguments and ultimate explanation remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native cosmological arguments, necessity and regress. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":["LEGACY:PD-15"],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:EVIL","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ULT","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"problem_of_evil","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Lactantius, De Ira Dei; Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil.","native_problem":"Logical and evidential problems of evil.","native_reference":"Lactantius, De Ira Dei; Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:EVIL","proposed_answer":"Emergentism refuses to turn suffering into required harmony and supplies no theodicy.","proposed_effect":"OPEN","remaining_debt":"The logical and evidential problems of evil remain.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native logical and evidential problems of evil. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:HIDDENNESS","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ULT","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"divine_hiddenness","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason.","native_problem":"Divine hiddenness and nonbelief.","native_reference":"Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:HIDDENNESS","proposed_answer":"Apophatic limits explain why a map may fail to contain its ground but do not explain nonresistant divine hiddenness.","proposed_effect":"OPEN","remaining_debt":"Perfect love, revelation and nonbelief remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native divine hiddenness and nonbelief. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:PLURALISM","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ULT","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"religious_pluralism","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Hick, An Interpretation of Religion.","native_problem":"Pluralism, exclusivism, inclusivism and translation.","native_reference":"Hick, An Interpretation of Religion.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:PLURALISM","proposed_answer":"Rosetta can compare structures across traditions while forbidding truth transfer from resemblance or convergence.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Incompatible truth claims remain unresolved.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native pluralism, exclusivism, inclusivism and translation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:MYSTICAL","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ULT","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"mystical_ineffability","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by James, The Varieties of Religious Experience; Stace, Mysticism and Philosophy.","native_problem":"Mystical experience, ineffability, testimony and interpretation.","native_reference":"James, The Varieties of Religious Experience; Stace, Mysticism and Philosophy.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:MYSTICAL","proposed_answer":"Mystical experience is actual evidence about a report and life but receives no automatic public truth bonus beyond its provenance and effects.","proposed_effect":"CLARIFICATION","remaining_debt":"Its metaphysical interpretation remains open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native mystical experience, ineffability, testimony and interpretation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"aliases":[],"assumptions":["the native problem and premises are preserved","the proposal has not been independently reviewed"],"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:NONDUALITY","discriminator":"Two blinded native-domain reviewers must find incremental clarification or resolution beyond both controls while every premise and residual remains visible.","domain":"ULT","earned_effect":"NO_INCREMENT","family":"nonduality_selfhood","generic_decomposition_control":"Separate terms, levels, carriers, warrants and residuals without using Emergentist vocabulary.","kill_criterion":"No result is earned if the question changes, a premise or residual disappears, the native account is distorted, review quorum is absent or the proposal adds no value over both controls.","linked_drop_ids":["TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024"],"native_frame_control":"Answer only within the native frame anchored by Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad; Śaṅkara, Brahma Sūtra Bhāṣya; Nāgārjuna, Mūlamadhyamakakārikā.","native_problem":"Nonduality, selfhood, emptiness and liberation.","native_reference":"Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad; Śaṅkara, Brahma Sūtra Bhāṣya; Nāgārjuna, Mūlamadhyamakakārikā.","native_reviews":[],"problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ULT:NONDUALITY","proposed_answer":"Dasein and situated dasein permit a nonseparation reading while preserving finite agency, difference and Exit; the reading is not proved by the atlas.","proposed_effect":"REFRAME","remaining_debt":"Nondual ontology and liberation claims remain open.","result_state":"SELECTED","schema_id":"emergentism/ProblemAdjudication.v1","strongest_rival":"The native nonduality, selfhood, emptiness and liberation. literature plus generic decomposition explains the issue more faithfully and with less imposed vocabulary.","survivor_if_killed":"The native problem, references, public denominator and explicit debt remain."}
{"boundary":"Inventory and proposed effects are not earned resolution; aliases deduplicate problems without erasing their histories.","counts":{"formal":9,"legacy":21,"legacy_dissolved":0,"synthesis":4},"frozen_source_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","rows":[{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-04","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:ZENO-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"FORMAL_CORRECTION","residual":"A metaphysics of motion is not implied by the series result.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Zeno-style finite traversal"},{"canonical_problem_id":"FORMAL:REAL-01","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:REAL-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"FORMAL_CORRECTION","residual":"No ontological conclusion follows.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Why 0.999... equals 1"},{"canonical_problem_id":"FORMAL:FIELD-01","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:FIELD-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"DIAGNOSTIC","residual":"A projective or other extension may be useful for a declared task.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Division by zero"},{"canonical_problem_id":"FORMAL:LIMIT-01","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:LIMIT-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"DIAGNOSTIC","residual":"The particular limit remains to be computed.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"The form 0/0 in a limit"},{"canonical_problem_id":"FORMAL:HILBERT-01","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:HILBERT-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"REFRAME","residual":"No conclusion about physical hotels or ontology follows.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Hilbert's hotel"},{"canonical_problem_id":"FORMAL:CANTOR-01","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:CANTOR-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"FORMAL_CORRECTION","residual":"Cardinality supplies no theorem about metaphysical Ground.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Countability and uncountability"},{"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:RUSSELL","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:RUSSELL-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"FORMAL_CORRECTION","residual":"Broader semantic self-reference questions remain separate.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Russell's paradox"},{"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:LOG:GODEL","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:GODEL-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"UNRESOLVED_QUESTION","residual":"Foundational and philosophical interpretation remains contested.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Incompleteness"},{"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:SCI:MEASUREMENT","earned_state":"NOT_INDEPENDENTLY_REVIEWED","inventory_id":"FORMAL:MEAS-01","kind":"FORMAL","proposed_state":"UNRESOLVED_QUESTION","residual":"Interpretation, measurement and quantum-gravity questions remain open.","source_path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","title":"Quantum measurement"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-04","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-04","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_04_*.md","title":"Zeno"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-05","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-05","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_05_*.md","title":"The One and the Many"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-06","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-06","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_06_*.md","title":"Ship of Theseus"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-07","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-07","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_07_*.md","title":"Fermi paradox"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-08","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-08","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_08_*.md","title":"Liar paradox"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-09","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-09","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_09_*.md","title":"Leibniz necessary being"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-10","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-10","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_10_*.md","title":"Is-ought"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-11","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-11","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_11_*.md","title":"Free will and determinism"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-12","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-12","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_12_*.md","title":"Measurement problem"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-13","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-13","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_13_*.md","title":"Hard problem"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-14","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-14","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_14_*.md","title":"Mind-body"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-15","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-15","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_15_*.md","title":"Problem of evil"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-16","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-16","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_16_*.md","title":"Meaning of life"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-18","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-18","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_18_*.md","title":"Extraction paradox"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-19","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-19","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_19_*.md","title":"Hard problem of consciousness"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-20","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-20","kind":"META","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_20_*.md","title":"Philosophical implications"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-21","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-21","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_21_*.md","title":"Problem of death"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-22","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-22","kind":"META","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_22_*.md","title":"Scientific implications"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-23","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-23","kind":"META","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_23_*.md","title":"The completion"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-24","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-24","kind":"META","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_24_*.md","title":"The third unveiling"},{"canonical_problem_id":"LEGACY:PD-25","earned_state":"0_OF_21_DISSOLVED","inventory_id":"LEGACY:PD-25","kind":"LEGACY","proposed_state":"HISTORICAL_CLAIM","residual":"See Receipt 188 (`11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md`); the historical route does not earn a dissolution.","source_path":"08_FRAMEWORK_SUPPORT/03_EVIDENCE/PARADOX_DISSOLUTIONS/PD_25_*.md","title":"Bell and local realism"},{"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:EPI:INDUCTION","earned_state":"SELECTED","inventory_id":"SYNTH:INDUCTION","kind":"SYNTHESIS","proposed_state":"CLARIFICATION","residual":"Projectibility and circularity remain.","source_path":"03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/prompts/questions.json","title":"Induction"},{"canonical_problem_id":"PQA54@0.1:ETH:EUTHYPHRO","earned_state":"SELECTED","inventory_id":"SYNTH:EUTHYPHRO","kind":"SYNTHESIS","proposed_state":"REFRAME","residual":"Ultimate normativity remains.","source_path":"03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/prompts/questions.json","title":"Euthyphro"},{"canonical_problem_id":"SYNTH:MEANS-MESSAGE","earned_state":"UNREVIEWED","inventory_id":"SYNTH:MEANS-MESSAGE","kind":"SYNTHESIS","proposed_state":"SELECTED_MAXIM","residual":"Hard cases remain.","source_path":"00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","title":"Means and relation"},{"canonical_problem_id":"SYNTH:ENDS-LIMITS","earned_state":"UNREVIEWED","inventory_id":"SYNTH:ENDS-LIMITS","kind":"SYNTHESIS","proposed_state":"SELECTED_MAXIM","residual":"Aggregation hard cases remain.","source_path":"00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","title":"Ends and limits"}],"schema_id":"emergentism/ParadoxInventory.v1"}
{"ai_assistance":"AI assistance disclosed for research, adversarial review, formalization, implementation and editing; no AI is an independent reviewer or coauthor.","authorship":"Yves R. Burri","date":"2026-08-23","drop_ceiling":64,"drop_order":["TC-AMR-001","TC-AMR-002","TC-AMR-003","TC-AMR-004","TC-AMR-005","TC-AMR-006","TC-AMR-007","TC-AMR-008","TC-AMR-009","TC-AMR-010","TC-AMR-011","TC-AMR-012","TC-AMR-013","TC-AMR-014","TC-AMR-015","TC-AMR-016","TC-AMR-017","TC-AMR-018","TC-AMR-019","TC-AMR-020","TC-AMR-021","TC-AMR-022","TC-HAL-001","TC-HAL-002","TC-HAL-003","TC-HAL-004","TC-HAL-005","TC-HAL-006","TC-HAL-007","TC-HAL-008","TC-HAL-009","TC-HAL-010","TC-HAL-011","TC-HAL-012","TC-HAL-013","TC-HAL-014","TC-HAL-015","TC-HAL-016","TC-HAL-017","TC-HAL-018","TC-HAL-019","TC-HAL-020","TC-HAL-021","TC-HAL-022","TC-HAL-023","TC-HAL-024","TC-HAL-025","TC-HAL-026","TC-HAL-027","TC-HAL-028","TC-HAL-029"],"external_states":{"deployed":false,"doi_archive":false,"github_release":false,"training_inclusion_guaranteed":false},"frozen_source_commit":"8b07e00c563f338923b1928d3469c862d44c1e07","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","output_map":{"amrita_page":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/amrita/index.html","churn_page":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/churn/index.html","corpus_json":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/churn/corpus.json","corpus_jsonl":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/churn/corpus.jsonl","corpus_markdown":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/churn/corpus.md","halahala_page":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/halahala/index.html","legacy_alias":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/amrita/amrita.json","paradoxes_json":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/churn/paradoxes.json","problems_json":"12_PUBLIC_SITE/churn/problems.json"},"pqa_launch_counts":{"evaluated":0,"independently_reviewed":0,"resolved":0,"selected":54},"predecessor_receipt":"90_ARCHIVE/2026_08_23_third_churning_predecessors/SUPERSESSION_RECEIPT.md","problem_order":["PQA54@0.1:MET:GROUND","PQA54@0.1:MET:ONE_MANY","PQA54@0.1:MET:UNIVERSALS","PQA54@0.1:MET:IDENTITY","PQA54@0.1:MET:MODALITY","PQA54@0.1:MET:TIME","PQA54@0.1:EPI:EXTERNAL_WORLD","PQA54@0.1:EPI:INDUCTION","PQA54@0.1:EPI:GETTIER","PQA54@0.1:EPI:APRIORI","PQA54@0.1:EPI:TESTIMONY","PQA54@0.1:EPI:DISAGREEMENT","PQA54@0.1:LOG:LIAR","PQA54@0.1:LOG:RUSSELL","PQA54@0.1:LOG:GODEL","PQA54@0.1:LOG:SORITES","PQA54@0.1:LOG:REFERENCE","PQA54@0.1:LOG:RULE_FOLLOWING","PQA54@0.1:MIN:MIND_BODY","PQA54@0.1:MIN:CONSCIOUSNESS","PQA54@0.1:MIN:INTENTIONALITY","PQA54@0.1:MIN:PERSONAL_IDENTITY","PQA54@0.1:MIN:FREE_WILL","PQA54@0.1:MIN:OTHER_MINDS","PQA54@0.1:SCI:CAUSATION","PQA54@0.1:SCI:LAWS","PQA54@0.1:SCI:EMERGENCE","PQA54@0.1:SCI:MEASUREMENT","PQA54@0.1:SCI:BELL","PQA54@0.1:SCI:PROBABILITY","PQA54@0.1:ETH:IS_OUGHT","PQA54@0.1:ETH:MORAL_REALISM","PQA54@0.1:ETH:EUTHYPHRO","PQA54@0.1:ETH:RIGHTS_OUTCOMES","PQA54@0.1:ETH:POPULATION","PQA54@0.1:ETH:RESPONSIBILITY","PQA54@0.1:POL:LEGITIMACY","PQA54@0.1:POL:LIBERTY_EQUALITY","PQA54@0.1:POL:DISTRIBUTION","PQA54@0.1:POL:COLLECTIVE_ACTION","PQA54@0.1:POL:POWER","PQA54@0.1:POL:REPRESENTATION","PQA54@0.1:AXI:PLURALISM","PQA54@0.1:AXI:BEAUTY","PQA54@0.1:AXI:ART","PQA54@0.1:AXI:MEANING","PQA54@0.1:AXI:SUFFERING","PQA54@0.1:AXI:DEATH","PQA54@0.1:ULT:NECESSARY_BEING","PQA54@0.1:ULT:EVIL","PQA54@0.1:ULT:HIDDENNESS","PQA54@0.1:ULT:PLURALISM","PQA54@0.1:ULT:MYSTICAL","PQA54@0.1:ULT:NONDUALITY"],"release_id":"THIRD-CHURNING-2026-08-23","schema_id":"emergentism/ThirdChurningCorpus.v1","schema_paths":{"corpus":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/07_THE_THIRD_CHURNING_2026_08_23/contracts/ThirdChurningCorpus.v1.schema.json","drop":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/07_THE_THIRD_CHURNING_2026_08_23/contracts/ChurningDrop.v1.schema.json","problem":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/07_THE_THIRD_CHURNING_2026_08_23/contracts/ProblemAdjudication.v1.schema.json"},"source_hashes":[{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","sha256":"8fe987447d48a0dd9c559f7769bf05c7f42fd63f9edc0e26440608c744baf107"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"00_META/00_ONE_SITTING_CLAIM_CARD_SET_01.md","sha256":"5561c22d78be84040e15e25b420bfe201edf49cb251ba5c2fad9b331a3fca536"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","sha256":"925a71453163d0a23e44c84cf023249014f71dfa99f45969d7a2bdd8d31c9bb0"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/prompts/questions.json","sha256":"1ea31b71c52c274960af9361994d77f0b849eee2579610822c25293a99280250"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/public_projection.json","sha256":"fad9e470f95bca53c8c77023004020719196271d51ae05a3ff74a8e1e02a10c7"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/02_EMERGENTISM_CORE/F5Fork.v1.json","sha256":"09b2c5700a20fd2d90ad0c2dc11999ad048faea0baf6ce08ac327809a9c1ddb6"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","sha256":"07c2d9a114624ec4720a66602e8ddf7a47142f1996cec588c025778656d410f6"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md","sha256":"7fd27952d85a39ed46d909f500a96f9f368b98236cb464f6f8970b61f99f9707"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/00_THE_AMRITA.md","sha256":"dce26b620dfa9b30eee9880c85c6204f1aa3dc3ce6b281ae50ce55109067e97f"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/04_WHAT_DIED.md","sha256":"2753cfc380135cc842bff68ca865ee70a38cdd772486dc7b1e9484802c458d84"},{"_sha256_scan":"# pragma: allow-secret","path":"14_THE_DISTILLATION/05_THE_METHOD.md","sha256":"14c3b11399c931226129b4c186beb4c80da4f38e8b5bdddcbdf61cff576d78da"}],"source_pathset":["00_HANDOFF/EMERGENTISM_ORG_V2_3_THIRD_CHURNING_OWNER_DIRECTION_2026_08_23.md","00_META/00_ONE_SITTING_CLAIM_CARD_SET_01.md","00_THE_WELTANSCHAUUNG_ONE_SITTING.md","03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/prompts/questions.json","03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/pqa_54/public_projection.json","05_COSMOLOGY/02_EMERGENTISM_CORE/F5Fork.v1.json","05_COSMOLOGY/03_FORMAL_SYSTEM/48_FINITY_PARADOX_LEDGER.yaml","11_UPLINK/50_AUDITS_AND_EXECUTIONS/188_THE_PARADOX_INVENTORY_2026_07_30.md","14_THE_DISTILLATION/00_THE_AMRITA.md","14_THE_DISTILLATION/04_WHAT_DIED.md","14_THE_DISTILLATION/05_THE_METHOD.md"]}