{ "candidate_records": [], "completeness_claim": false, "counts": { "candidates": 0, "frozen_tests": 0, "gaps": 12, "revisions": 0, "world_receipts": 0 }, "frozen_test_records": [], "gaps": [ { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover the native domain baseline and show that each candidate preserves its declared order and boundary behavior before outcome contact.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "scale-contract-required", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-03", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Only after the scale contract survives, compare held-out calibration and prediction; otherwise publish non-identifiability.", "independent_replication": "An external custodian audits the scale contract, reruns any lawful frozen comparison, and publishes nulls.", "kill_criterion": "No conclusion survives admissible reparameterization, rank reversals are arbitrary, or the measures encode the desired result.", "maturity_state": "packet-complete", "native_equations": "The selected minimum convention and other conjunctive rules; a product is admissible as a ranking only under separately defended cardinal scales.", "native_objects": "Ordinal foresight and usable-means ranks, declared admissible transformations, and outcome; cardinal variables only if separately validated and commensurate.", "no_placement_rival": "No cross-factor scalar ranking, or an ordinary domain aggregator selected without D-level placement.", "permutation_challenge": "Reparameterize inputs over the declared admissible class and test whether the conclusion and ranking survive.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-03.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "discriminator-or-nonidentifiability-required", "maturity": "packet-complete", "program": "deferred" }, "question": "Does any cross-factor AND-class conclusion survive the admissible strictly increasing reparameterizations of the declared ordinal inputs?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-03", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/0", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/2", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Joint necessity and the selected minimum convention; a local product only under a defended cardinal scale.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Ordinal AND-class aggregation" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover resource accounting and task-performance baselines.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "ready-to-freeze", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-04", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Predict outcome and remaining means in held-out states.", "independent_replication": "Independent lab repeats the measurement design.", "kill_criterion": "No recurrent trade-off or a simpler surface predicts as well.", "maturity_state": "packet-complete", "native_equations": "No-tradeoff, additive, nonlinear and state-dependent resource-surface rivals.", "native_objects": "Measured modeling cost, usable means, task state and outcome.", "no_placement_rival": "Ordinary resource-allocation model without Phi/V interpretation.", "permutation_challenge": "Exchange labels and functional forms while holding measured budgets fixed.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-04.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "ready-to-freeze", "maturity": "packet-complete", "program": "queued" }, "question": "What measurable budget surface, if any, relates option-model quality, its resource cost, and remaining usable means?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-04", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/1", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/3", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Joint necessity may remain a task-specific description.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Foresight and usable-means surface" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Reproduce known control effects without an Emergentist variable.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "new-preregistration-required", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-07", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Content-specific change in present action beyond matched controls.", "independent_replication": "Independent sample and analysts reproduce the effect.", "kill_criterion": "Effect vanishes under fair controls or does not replicate.", "maturity_state": "component-supported", "native_equations": "Native behavioral or cognitive model selected before data contact.", "native_objects": "Present representations, salience, demand, reward, memory, expectancy and action.", "no_placement_rival": "Generic framing, salience, demand, memory or reward model.", "permutation_challenge": "Permute content while matching salience, demand and reward.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-07.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "new-preregistration-required", "maturity": "component-supported", "program": "queued" }, "question": "Does changing represented future content alter present selection beyond salience, demand, reward framing, memory, and expectancy?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-07", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/2", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/7", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Present models can guide ordinary present action.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[I/C]", "title": "Controlled future-content effect" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Both models recover training-domain behavior before intervention.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "real-domain-freeze-required", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-01", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Relation-aware model predicts held-out intervention outcome.", "independent_replication": "Independent domain team repeats the intervention.", "kill_criterion": "Relations add no discrimination or fail to recover element behavior.", "maturity_state": "packet-complete", "native_equations": "Element-only and relation-aware native models.", "native_objects": "Identical element inventories, intervenable relation structures and outcomes.", "no_placement_rival": "Feature engineering or definitional expansion without emergence language.", "permutation_challenge": "Randomize relation labels and structures while preserving inventories.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-01.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "real-domain-freeze-required", "maturity": "packet-complete", "program": "queued" }, "question": "Can a relation-aware model predict an intervention better than a model with the same elements but no explicit relation structure?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-01", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/3", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/0", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "D2 remains a useful configuration address.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Relation intervention" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover carrier, incentive, command and environment effects first.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "composite-test-required", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-06", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Trace intervention predicts later selection across turnover beyond rivals.", "independent_replication": "A second site reproduces all five markers with bearer costs.", "kill_criterion": "Any marker fails or rivals absorb the intervention effect.", "maturity_state": "component-supported", "native_equations": "Native causal or organizational models for trace and choice intervention.", "native_objects": "Trace, carriers, turnover, choices, recurrent bias and attributed substrate costs.", "no_placement_rival": "Carrier identity, incentives, direct coordination, environment or observer narrative.", "permutation_challenge": "Remove, scramble and replace traces and carriers separately.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-06.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "composite-test-required", "maturity": "component-supported", "program": "queued" }, "question": "Does a persistent shared trace survive carrier turnover and measurably reweight later choices beyond current incentives and direct coordination?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-06", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/4", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/5", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Trace-mediated coordination in its native scope.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[I/C]", "title": "Egregoreotype trace intervention" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover fixed-plan, ordinary-role, generalist-team, and standard multi-objective governance baselines before adding the placement.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "ready-to-preregister", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-12", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Compare held-out delivery, correction, delayed harm, lock-in, and real exit against the strongest ordinary-governance rival.", "independent_replication": "An external team repeats the preregistered comparison with bearer costs and nulls visible.", "kill_criterion": "No out-of-sample gain, proxy harm or lock-in appears, or an ordinary-governance rival performs as well.", "maturity_state": "packet-complete", "native_equations": "Standard multi-objective and receding-horizon governance comparators; Rosetta labels are never measurements.", "native_objects": "Long and short horizons T_L and T_S, bearer vector, voluntary role assignments, tie-breakers, exit costs, tragic residue, and delivery and harm outcomes.", "no_placement_rival": "Transparent ordinary governance with explicit horizons, responsibilities, appeals, and exit but no Emergentist or Rosetta placement.", "permutation_challenge": "Swap horizons and role assignments while holding tasks, bearers, authority, and resources fixed.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-12.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "ready-to-freeze", "maturity": "packet-complete", "program": "queued" }, "question": "Do nested learning and responsibility horizons with explicit bearers, tie-breakers, and exit outperform ordinary governance rivals without proxy harm or lock-in?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-12", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/5", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/6", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "An explicit horizon, bearer, tie-breaker, tragic-residue, and exit record.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Nested-horizon coordination" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover reactive and planning performance before positing a distinct capacity.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "fair-D4-baselines-required", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-02", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "Independent D5 measure predicts action beyond rich D4 baselines.", "independent_replication": "Independent lab and task family reproduce the delta.", "kill_criterion": "No effect beyond fair D4 baselines.", "maturity_state": "component-supported", "native_equations": "Native model-based, model-free, memory and search baselines.", "native_objects": "Represented alternatives, present state, means, search, policy and action.", "no_placement_rival": "Ordinary model-based control or cached policy.", "permutation_challenge": "Manipulate future content with present state and means matched.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-02.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "fair-D4-baselines-required", "maturity": "component-supported", "program": "queued" }, "question": "Does a separately measured capacity to represent alternatives predict action beyond rich reactive, planning, memory, and search baselines?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-02", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/6", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/1", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Model-mediated anticipation remains ordinary causal cognition.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Distinct counterfactual capacity" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover ordinary causal-volume results first.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "independent-metric-missing", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-09", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "History metric predicts something beyond causal volume and search budget.", "independent_replication": "Independent mathematical and empirical review.", "kill_criterion": "Metric tracks only causal volume or model resolution.", "maturity_state": "deferred", "native_equations": "Native spacetime geometry plus an independently warranted history metric.", "native_objects": "Minkowski causal volume, model resolution and independently defined history entropy.", "no_placement_rival": "Ordinary spacetime volume and model-complexity accounting.", "permutation_challenge": "Vary model resolution independently of physical cone geometry.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-09.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "independent-metric-missing", "maturity": "deferred", "program": "deferred" }, "question": "Can history entropy be defined independently of Minkowski causal volume, model resolution, and search budget?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-09", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/7", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/9", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Physical cone and option bundle remain distinct useful objects.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "History-bundle metric" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Each row recovers its lower register independently.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "row-by-row-only", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-05", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "One frozen discriminator per seam before any census result.", "independent_replication": "Every row requires separate external replication.", "kill_criterion": "Rows are arbitrary or a proposed irreducible freedom escapes the scaffold.", "maturity_state": "packet-complete", "native_equations": "Native lower and candidate upper models for each seam.", "native_objects": "One declared system and candidate new freedom per crossing.", "no_placement_rival": "Continuous multiscale description or another rung count.", "permutation_challenge": "Change rung order and labels; test whether each row remains nonarbitrary.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-05.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "row-by-row-only", "maturity": "packet-complete", "program": "queued" }, "question": "Does each proposed aperture possess an independent novelty discriminator and a lower-register recovery test?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-05", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/8", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/4", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "A non-exhaustive address system.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[I/C]", "title": "Five-crossing census" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover accepted theory in its tested domain before any crosswalk.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "24-permutation-preregistration-draft", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-10", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "One novel quantitative row-specific prediction.", "independent_replication": "Independent physics group reproduces prediction and recovery.", "kill_criterion": "Rows permute freely, lack mechanism or fail recovery.", "maturity_state": "deferred", "native_equations": "Standard Model, general relativity or effective native equations as applicable.", "native_objects": "Native fields, states, symmetries, observables and interactions for each row.", "no_placement_rival": "Native theories with no Emergentist grammar.", "permutation_challenge": "Test all 24 row permutations and matched decorative maps.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-10.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "native-row-maps-missing", "maturity": "deferred", "program": "deferred" }, "question": "Does each proposed force-affinity row recover its native theory and outperform every permutation on a quantitative discriminator?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-10", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/9", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/10", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Historical origin and D-scaffold translation only.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Force and freedom affinities" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "Recover all shared operational predictions.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "discriminator-or-nonidentifiability-required", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-08", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "An observation sensitive to ontic plurality rather than epistemic support.", "independent_replication": "Independent foundations analysis and empirical replication if identifiable.", "kill_criterion": "No interpretation-sensitive discriminator exists.", "maturity_state": "deferred", "native_equations": "Shared native formalism plus interpretation-specific predictions if any.", "native_objects": "Operational observations and rival quantum or cosmological interpretations.", "no_placement_rival": "One actual history plus epistemic uncertainty.", "permutation_challenge": "Exchange interpretation labels without changing observables.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-08.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "discriminator-or-nonidentifiability-required", "maturity": "deferred", "program": "deferred" }, "question": "Is there any observation that distinguishes ontic plurality of complete histories from epistemic support over alternatives?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-08", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/10", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/8", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "History-space modeling remains valid mathematics.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Ontology-sensitive plurality" }, { "accepted_domain_recovery": "All earlier row recoveries and nulls remain visible.", "candidate_ids": [], "execution_requirement": "runs-last", "gap_id": "frontier-gap:GP-11", "held_out_incremental_prediction": "One novel frozen discriminator not inherited from component theories.", "independent_replication": "External red team, independent replication and published null route.", "kill_criterion": "No incremental prediction or recurring harmful overreach.", "maturity_state": "deferred", "native_equations": "Every native science retains its accepted equations; common dynamics must be separately supplied.", "native_objects": "Plural native-domain objects plus predeclared common task and consequences.", "no_placement_rival": "Plural native sciences with no common Emergentist placement.", "permutation_challenge": "Compare the complete grammar with reordered mappings and a no-placement rival.", "public_href": "/frontier/v1/gaps/GP-11.json", "public_routing_state": { "execution": "runs-last", "maturity": "deferred", "program": "deferred" }, "question": "Can the complete grammar make one novel frozen prediction with consequence value beyond serious plural-domain rivals?", "receipt_ids": [], "revision_ids": [], "schema_id": "FrontierGap.v1", "source_gap_id": "GP-11", "source_refs": [ { "authority": "canonical_gap_owner", "json_pointer": "/rows/11", "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "authority": "public_routing_overlay", "json_pointer": "/openQuestions/11", "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "survivor": "Tier, rival, kill, receipt, repair and exit discipline.", "test_ids": [], "tier": "[C]", "title": "Integrated worldview adequacy" } ], "lifecycle": [ "FrontierGap.v1", "FrontierCandidate.v1", "FrontierFrozenTest.v1", "FrontierWorldReceiptRef.v1", "FrontierRevision.v1" ], "live_service": { "accepts_credentials": false, "accepts_payment": false, "accepts_private_data": false, "accepts_submissions": false, "enabled": false, "may_authorize": false, "may_sign": false, "model_execution": false, "sensor_ingestion": false }, "projection_state": "OFFLINE_READY_DRAFT", "protocol_version": "1.0.0", "revision_records": [], "role_firewall": { "emergentism": "TYPING_VERSIONING_CUSTODY_AND_EXIT_PROTOCOL", "evidence_custodian": "INDEPENDENT_PROVENANCE_AND_RESULT_REFERENCE", "model": "CANDIDATE_CONTRIBUTOR_NO_AUTHORITY", "principal": "EXTERNAL_MANDATE_AND_AUTHORIZATION_BEARER", "sensor": "OBSERVATION_CARRIER_NOT_INDEPENDENT_WITNESS" }, "schema_id": "FrontierGraph.v1", "semantic_owner": "03_METHODOLOGY/03_PREREGISTRATIONS/frontier_protocol/README.md", "source_authority": "The W7 register owns canonical gap contracts; living-map.json owns public routing only; this graph is a deterministic reference projection.", "source_inputs": [ { "path": "03_METHODOLOGY/00_W7_SCIENCE_INTEGRATION_EXECUTION_REGISTER.yaml", "role": "canonical_gap_owner", "sha256": "sha256:775800070a05ca119a52874e34c86cfb3515ae5c55d1292c06e9115d369f843f" }, { "path": "12_PUBLIC_SITE/living-map.json", "role": "public_routing_overlay", "sha256": "sha256:89361e816e74ae838e00013d70ebeddfa4bf9741a7db5e4ce986aa64b4ba9e16" } ], "world_contact_accepted": 0, "world_receipt_refs": [] }