D0 → μ0 → D1 → μ1 → D2 → μ2 → D3 → μ3 → D4 → μ4 → D5 → b6 → D6 → r6 → D0
The dimension-first spine
A scaffold, not a census forced on nature. Each page separates inherited mathematics or science from Emergentist interpretation, and every crossing carries a prediction and a way to fail.
How to read it
- D4 carriers/events are actual; D5 represented contents are merely possible. An actual D4 model token may represent D5 content.
- μ₀…μ₄ are candidate apertures. Empty evidence remains unassessed.
- b₆ and r₆ are boundary relations, not additional μ-crossings.
- The matter→bond→life→mind→choice story is an optional interpretation, not the owner of the formal registers.
- D1–D5 are the selected actual positive dimensions of freedom [I]; D0 and D6 are boundary roles. “Actual” describes the dimensions' ontological status; D5 content remains possible, not D4 actual. D1 is arithmetic of relative numbers and their relationships; D2 is the plane with two independent real coordinates; relations and constraints organize configurations within it. D3 is local three-coordinate space; D4 adds time and declared causal geometry. D5 varies among admissible histories, with a literal fifth-coordinate count conditional on a declared independent one-parameter family.
- The numbering marks a selected dependency order, not a worth ladder or universal empirical census. Dependency priority asks what rules and carriers a realization presupposes; actuality asks what causally occurred; psychological salience asks what is vivid now. No dimension assigns greater moral worth or standing to any person or thing.
One reading route · no proof transfer
From the whole to its consequence
Dasein asks for the whole account; the dimension pages type its dependencies. D5 then distinguishes possible and actual power before the selected G7@1 vocabulary is projected into the Burrisphere, translated through Rosetta, and returned to practice by the Soul Loop. This sequence is a handoff, not a derivation: geometry does not force seven, G7@1 != GEN7@1 (G7@1 ≠ GEN7@1), and convergence is not truth evidence.
The D5 display adds one selected 360° display path—a reading itinerary (presentation-itinerary-only), not time, dynamics, recurrence, moral ascent, or a count source. Its signed G7 plane remains distinct from the lowercase reciprocal chart and uppercase node model. Under the declared normalization VMO=2x/(1+x), SKA=2/(1+x), and E_B=VMO×SKA=4x/(1+x)², the maximum value is numeric 1 at x=1 on the ray; the azimuth-independent sphere extension is maximized across the whole equator [A/S]. The glyph ⊙ names Finity and is not a unique sphere point or numeric value. Physical calibration remains open. Historical chart balance is a separate mathematical witness, not this product.
M4-01 · measured scope [B]: both four-contrast implementations were KILLED in their declared tests. The distinct two-axis extension is unrun and needs a separately frozen encoding, target and comparison; these losses remain visible.
Game theory is not exhausted. A further [C] wager proposes that cross-game self/other direction and possible/actual power-channel orientation is maximally compressed by the selected 4-cell M4 vocabulary. This intensional-not-extensional compression does not reconstruct native games; it preserves players, coalitions, information, timing, payoffs, repetition, stochasticity, institutions, learning, equilibrium concepts. Inspect that bounded compression →
Maximality test · [C]: preregistration-required-not-run; lossy coding; 7 fields fixed before coding; 3 comparators; criterion declared rate-distortion frontier; definition minimum-description-length-at-fixed-acceptable-performance-within-preregistered-comparator-class; 3 kills; globalUniqueEstablished=false; truthEvidence=false. A finite run cannot prove unique global maximality.
Related instruments and preserved visual studies
Suda notes · The Egg · Riemann view · Earlier journey view
These are supporting projections. The typed spine above governs where they conflict.